Radioactive dating debate


15-Nov-2019 15:15

When I first got involved in the creationism/evolution controversy, back in early 1995, I looked around for an article or book that explained radiometric dating in a way that nonscientists could understand. Young-Earth creationists -- that is, creationists who believe that Earth is no more than 10,000 years old -- are fond of attacking radiometric dating methods as being full of inaccuracies and riddled with sources of error. All these methods point to Earth being very, very old -- several billions of years old.I found several good sources, but none that seemed both complete enough to stand alone and simple enough for a nongeologist to understand them.

Calcium-aluminium-rich inclusions—the oldest known solid constituents within meteorites that are formed within the Solar System—are 4.567 billion years old, giving an age for the Solar System and an upper limit for the age of Earth.Some evidence is also presented to show that radiometric results that are in agreement with the accepted geological time scale are selectively published in preference to those results that are not in agreement.



Others have fallen by the wayside, but we remain, and have grown to one of the most popular and user friendly sites on the internet.… continue reading »


Read more